Presidents Who Kept on Trucking

Happy Presidents day! We thought we would take a couple minutes today and look back on what US presidents have done for the trucking industry.

In the late 1930s, the Interstate Commerce Commission, created under president  Grover Cleveland, and the American Trucking Association  partnered in an attempt to regulate what had previously been a chaotic and unstable industry.  The setting of trucking rates, which had been a matter between the individual trucker and the customer, gave way to the establishment of rate bureaus, which are owned and supported by all participating carriers.

In 1962 President John Kennedy became the first president to send a transportation message to Congress demanding a strict reduction IN regulations of surface freight transportation. In November 1975 President Gerald Ford called for legislation to reduce trucking regulation as well. He followed that by appointing to the ICC several commissioners who favored competition in the truckload transportation industry. By the end of 1976, these commissioners were speaking out for a more competitive policy at the ICC, a position rarely articulated in the previous eight decades of transportation regulation.

President Jimmy Carter followed Ford’s lead by appointing strong deregulatory advocates and supporting legislation to reduce motor carrier regulations. After a series of ICC rulings that reduced federal oversight of trucking, and after the deregulation of the airline industry, Congress, spurred by the Carter administration, enacted the Motor Carrier Act of 1980. This act limited the ICC’s authority over trucking.

Both the Teamsters Union and the American Trucking Associations strongly opposed deregulation and successfully headed off efforts to eliminate all economic controls. Supporting deregulation was a coalition of shippers, consumer advocates including Ralph Nader, and liberals such as Senator Edward Kennedy. Probably the most significant factor in forcing Congress to act was that the ICC commissioners appointed by Ford and Carter were bent on deregulating the industry anyway. Either Congress had to act or the ICC would. Congress acted in order to codify some of the commission changes and to limit others.

The Motor Carrier Act (MCA) of 1980 only partially decontrolled trucking. But together with a liberal ICC, it substantially freed the industry. The MCA made it significantly easier for a trucker to secure a certificate of public convenience and necessity. The MCA also required the commission to eliminate most restrictions on commodities that could be carried, on the routes that motor carriers could use, and on the geographical region they could serve. The law authorized truckers to price freely within a zone of reasonableness, meaning that truckers could increase or decrease rates from current levels by 15 percent without challenge, and encouraged them to make independent rate filings with even larger price changes. De regulation was said to bring on better services and rates to shippers as truckers started restructuring routes, reducing empty return hauls, and provided simplified rate structures.  The MCA act also led to a boost in the number of licensed motor carriers. By 1990 the total number of licensed carriers exceeded forty thousand, considerably more than double the number authorized in 1980.

Trucking deregulation is far from finished  According to one study, abolishing all remaining federal controls would save shippers about $28 billion per year. A Department of Transportation study done by researchers at the University of Pennsylvania’s Wharton School estimated that abolishing state regulation would save another $5 billion to $12 billion.

Valentines Day by the Truckload

A Total of 189 million stems of roses are sold in the U.S. on Valentine’s Day. California produces 60 percent of American roses but the majority of roses sold on Valentine’s Day in the United States are imported, mostly from South America. So how is cupid influencing truckload rate trends Nationwide this year ?  According to Transcore’s Freight Talk Blog, reefer rates last week out of California where up, especially out of the Los Angeles hub.

flower delivery , fresh flowers, reefer rates;

Shipping flowers by the truckload comes with a number specific requirements that have to be respected to guarantee quality delivery.  Most fresh flowers are shipped using reefer trailers with strict reefer temperature requirements between 36 and 46 degrees Fahrenheit.  Other equipment requirements include things like resealed Dock Doors to prevent refrigerated air from escaping during loading and unloading.

Valentines Day also has a sweet spot for food shippers.  As  the state with the most chocolate manufacturing establishments in the nation, California has been busy over the last weeks as it experiences  a boom in demand for chocolate.  More than 35 million heart-shaped boxes of chocolate will be sold for Valentine’s Day leading to over $1 billion worth of chocolate purchased in the US. Chocolate aside, over 8 billion candy hearts will be produced and shipped! Valentines day is the 4th busiest holiday for confectionery makes behind Halloween, Easter and  Christmas.

 

 

Price of Tires Keeps on Climbing

It’s the Monday after the Super Bowl and if you’re Pat’s fans like us at Open Mile, we are only interested in talking about the commercials. The BridgeStone ad’s in particular drew our attention. With the cost of rubber soaring to an all-time high, it’s no surprise tire companies are spending big marketing dollars in an effort to help boost sales.  Whether you are an owner operator or you run a larger carrier business, replacing tires comprises a large portion of maintenance costs and unfortunately according to tire manufacturers, prices are not predicted to drop anytime in 2012.

So what is driving up the prices of tires these days?

The cost of both natural rubber and synthetic rubber reached record highs in 2011. A few of the factors driving the cost increase are 1) raw rubber costs increased due to adverse weather in Asia in 2010 which led to a rubber shortage.  2) Ironically enough, rising costs in the transportation of chemicals required to manufacture both rubber and tires have increased. 3) The rising cost of carbon black. This particular increase is largely due to a drop in supply as  major manufacturer of carbon black dropped out of the business two or three years ago. Even if the price of rubber dropped today carriers would not feel the effects for 3-6 months because of how the rubber supply chain works.
When natural rubber is bought from Thailand, it comes over on a freighter to ports in the US. From there it’s loaded onto a truck and transported to various plants like Goodyear and Micheline, where it is put into raw material inventory.  From there it is made into an actual tire, which is put into a warehouse until it’s bought, the purchaser is invoiced and the money comes in. This whole process takes roughly two quarters to complete.
“A true price adjustment lag is being felt in the rubber supply chain: Say we’re buying natural rubber today and it’s lower than it was six months ago; it’s going to take five, six months for that to show up in our product cost,” Donn Kramer, Goodyear’s director of product marketing.

The high prices of rubber are being felt by fleet managers and some fleet owners have reported the increase to be as steep as 25%. In an effort to combat the rising costs fleet owners should beprice of rubber; tires; manufacture looking for ways to limit the effect of rising rubber costs to their businesses. Two ways tire manufacturers say they have taken steps to counter the price increases are: The development of low-rolling-resistance tires which improve fuel efficiency and are SmartWay certified. Also, another example of a technology that is being used to preserve to the life of a tire is DuraSeal. The casings of these tires will carry a seven-year unlimited retread warranty which aims to provide future buyers with an incentive to purchase the more expensive tires.
The price of tires is not predicted to go down anytime soon, the one thing that remains to be seen is how carriers decide to incorporate this cost in their general operating rates and  to what what level it will affect both shippers and consequently consumers.
.